Testimony on House Bill 1397
To: House Political Subdivisions CommitteeFrom: Christopher
T. Dodson, Executive Director
Subject: House Bill 1397 (County Zoning and Farm Practices)
Date: January 27, 1999
Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, I am Christopher
Dodson, the executive director of the North Dakota Catholic
Conference. The North Dakota Catholic Conference opposes
House Bill 1397.
The North Dakota Catholic Conference is concerned about the
future of farming in North Dakota. This is why last
November the North Dakota Catholic bishops issued a joint
statement on the matter of rural life. In that statement
the bishops called for policies consistent with the
principle of subsidiarity. This principle recognizes that
human dignity requires that persons and communities should
possess the ability to exercise responsible
self-governance. Subsidiarity means that while larger
governments have a role and sometimes a duty to involve
themselves in local affairs, they should give deference and
due respect to local communities. Specifically applying the
principle of subsidiarity to rural issues, the bishops
stated that local communities should be allowed to enact
land use ordinances to further the common good. House Bill
1397 violates that principle by stripping counties of their
rightful position to regulate for the common good of the
larger community.
We realize that the purpose of the bill is to assist
farming. For several reasons, however, is not an
appropriate way to accomplish that goal. First, the
approach rests on the false assumption that all farming
practices are equal with respect to their effects on the
community and the environment. This simply is not true and
we need only to look at the environmental and social
problems in other states to realize that some agricultural
practices operate in a manner contrary to the common good
and good stewardship of creation.
Second, the bill embraces a mistaken view of property.
Property rights are important, but they are not absolute.
All property is held in what the Pope has called a "social
mortgage." That means that no one, including farmers, has a
right to do whatever they want with their property. All
exercise over property is subject to the common good, the
need to respect human life and dignity, and proper
stewardship of creation. Civil authorities, especially
local authorities, have a duty to regulate the use of
property for the common good and all citizens have a moral
obligation to comply with proper regulations.
Finally, we are concerned about the possible effects of
this bill. State Catholic conferences and dioceses around
the nation, as well as the National Catholic Rural Life
Conference, are very concerned about the growth of large
concentrated animal feeding operations. These operations
have threatened God's creation, disrupted communities, and
endangered family farming. The states with the most
problems are often the ones that have stripped local
communities of their rightful role in regulating the
operation of such facilities. We don't need those types of
problems in North Dakota; we don't need House Bill 1397.