Private Property
by Christopher Dodson,
Executive Director, North Dakota Catholic Conference
March 2004
“Basic to peace, order, and progress is the security
of private property. On this account Pope Leo XIII . . . in
his celebrated encyclical, Rerum Novarum . . . developed at
length arguments in behalf of private property. ‘The
law, therefore, should favor ownership,’ he wrote,
‘and its policy should be to induce as many people as
possible to become owners.’ Many excellent results
will follow from such a governmental policy. First of all
property will be more equitably divided. Many of the
economic and social evils of our day go back to the fact
that the distribution of wealth is not more equitable.
‘Wealth . . . must be so distributed amongst the
various individuals and classes of society,’
emphasizes Pope Pius XI in his encyclical on the
Reconstruction of Social Order, ‘that the needs of
all . . . be thereby satisfied.’”
This commentary on the importance of private property and
the need for government to make sure it is equitably
distributed, sounds like it could have been recently said
by Pope John Paul II. In fact, it was written in 1937 by
Aloisius J. Muench, then Bishop of Fargo.
Bishop Muench’s primary concern was the loss of
family farms and the loss of control and equity farmers had
in their operations. Sixty-seven years later, the problem
has worsened probably beyond Bishop Muench’s worst
imagination. We have only a fraction of the number of
farmers we had in 1937 and those remaining are increasingly
under the direct and indirect control of creditors,
marketing operatives, government programs, and trade
agreements.
The truth about private property and distribution of wealth
discussed by Bishop Muench reaches beyond matters of
agriculture. One wonders what he would have thought about
the concentration of ownership in today’s world, like
that which exists in broadcast media, telecommunications,
computer technology, retail, banking, food processing,
publishing, and transportation. Whatever the type of
industry, service, or property, the ever-increasing trend
toward greater ownership by fewer persons raises serious
questions of justice. If ownership of private property
enhances peace, order, progress, and the stability of
families, denial of that ownership threatens peace, order,
progress, and families.
When Bishop Muench spoke about how many of the evils of his
day were related to the inequitable distribution of wealth
he was probably referring to economic injustices. I think,
however, that today he would recognize that such
concentration of wealth leads to other evils as well.
Several watchers of media ownership, for example, have
noted that incidents of obscenity and indecency have
increased correspondingly with media ownership
concentration. Local ownership is typically more respectful
of communities’ values.
There may also be a connection – at least spiritual
– with concentrated ownership and the culture of
death. Key to the acceptance of greater concentration of
ownership is the idea that property rights are absolute and
the belief that greater efficiency is always good. John
Paul II, however, in his encyclical The Gospel of Life,
identifies both of these ideas as contributors to the
culture of death.
Addressing the problem of concentrated ownership is
difficult. For one thing, lower prices and greater
efficiency sometimes do result from concentration. It is
difficult for people to look beyond these benefits and see
the more hidden, but sometimes disastrous, social and
spiritual costs.
Secondly, too many in our country look at any policy
fostering greater distribution of wealth and property as an
undue infringement upon liberty and, worse, a form of
socialism. Catholic social teaching makes clear, however,
that the matter is not so black and white. The Church
recognizes that, like collectivist socialism, unbridled
economic activity threatens legitimate ownership of private
property and, consequently, families.
Finally, there is hesitancy, even among those aware of the
problem, to challenge a system so deeply entrenched in our
society. It seems easier to rally behind short-term fixes,
even if they address only the symptoms of the problem.
For inspiration, we should look at Pope John Paul II.
Always the prophet of hope, he calls us to go to the root
of problems and deal with the systemic issues. I think
Bishop – later Cardinal – Muench would agree.