A Look at 2003
Session
by Christopher Dodson,
Executive Director, North Dakota Catholic Conference
May 2003
The North Dakota legislative session and the subsequent
special session have finished. From a Catholic perspective,
how did this session fare? How does it compare to the
legislative actions in other states this year?
These are not easy questions to answer. If we count
“wins and losses” for bills followed by the
North Dakota Catholic Conference this year, this was a good
session. Some very important items, like increased funding
for the corporate guardianship program run by Catholic
Family Services, conscience protection for adoption
agencies, and a ban on human cloning were all passed.
A true Catholic perspective, however, asks not about wins
and losses, but about whether the life and dignity of the
human person, the common good, and justice were advanced or
diminished. These are long term and multifaceted concerns
that cannot be measured by the success or failure of a
single bill. Certainly, the legislature’s reduction
in funding for human service programs and failure to
significantly address the problems of out-migration give
cause for concern. On the other hand, the funding cuts are
unlikely to be as severe -- in both dollar and human terms
-- as they are in other states.
Despite the press reports of partisan battles and party
in-fighting, and even with a very limited amount of funds
to appropriate, the mood and morale around the legislature
seemed better than in some of the last sessions. Bills
moved quickly, but -- with a few exceptions -- not so fast
as to avoid significant public input. The overall tone of
discourse among legislators and lobbyists seemed better.
For the most part, North Dakota legislators are
well-meaning, courteous, professional, and very
hard-working. No matter what their political party,
religion, or philosophy, they deserve our respect and
appreciation.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
Now that the session is over, observers are putting
together “best and worst” lists. Here is a list
admittedly formed by my own observations and the views of
the North Dakota Catholic Conference.
Best bill: SB 2188 -- ensuring conscience protection for
adoption agencies; HB 1424 - ban on human cloning.
Worse bill introduced: There were too many to name here.
All, thankfully, were defeated.
Most long overdue: Corporate guardianship funding increase.
This essential program administered by Catholic Family
Service had not received a funding increase since 1995. The
legislature, going against the Governor’s recommended
budget, took care of that.
Biggest disappointment: SB 2364 -- Children's health
insurance for unborn. The Bush administration revised rules
for the state children’s health insurance program so
states could include unborn children in the program.
Various federal, state, and insurance industry policies,
however, made it unworkable. Supporters eventually withdrew
and hope to fix the problems before the next session.
Most embarrassing law that needs repeal: Welfare Family
Caps. This policy has failed to reduce out-of-wedlock
pregnancies, implicitly encourages abortion and
contraception, is discriminatory, and, contrary to good
moral theology, embraces an illicit means to accomplish a
desired good. HB 1460 would have repealed the law, but
failed in the House.
Most hated bill that passed: HB 1489 -- New Teacher
Qualifications. This bill implements the new teacher
requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind Act. No
one seemed to like it, but it passed anyway.
Darned if you do, darned if you don’t bill: HB 1467
-- Prohibit state agencies from receiving federal family
planning funds. If state agencies could not accept funds,
the money would go to private, less accountable
organizations. It failed.
Most threatening to Catholic entities and employers: HB
1247 -- Would have mandated insurance coverage of
contraception and “emergency contraception.” It
failed.
I’ll have more “bests” and
“worsts” in next month’s
column.